<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hindson &#38; Melton LLC &#187; Roswell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hindsonmelton.net/tag/roswell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hindsonmelton.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 21:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>2013 ESTATE TAX LAW UPDATE FROM HINDSON AND MELTON LLC</title>
		<link>http://hindsonmelton.net/2013-estate-tax-law-update-from-hindson-and-melton-llc/</link>
		<comments>http://hindsonmelton.net/2013-estate-tax-law-update-from-hindson-and-melton-llc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 04:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hindsonmelton]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial and Tax Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trusts and Wills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dunwoody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Springs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hindsonmelton.net/?p=2445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Key features of 2013 estate tax laws after American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) include the following.  Information from partner Karen Hindson of the Georgia and South Carolina estate planning firm Hindson &#38; Melton LLC: The exclusion amount of $5 million continues in effect but is inflation-adjusted; for 2012 the exclusion amount was $5.12 million and for 2013 it increases to $5.25 million.  If ATRA had not passed, the estate tax exclusion amount for 2013 would have dropped to $1 million, with no inflation adjustment. Portability has been enacted as a permanent feature of federal estate tax law.  Portability allows a surviving spouse to utilize the unused portion of the first spouse to die&#8217;s gift and estate tax exclusion amount. Portability is an election that requires filing a Form 706 estate tax return, even if the estate and gifts of the first spouse are less than the exclusion amount.   As a result, the surviving spouse must weigh the expense and complexity of filing the estate tax return against the likelihood that the second spouse to die will need the unused portion of the first spouse&#8217;s gift and estate tax exclusion amount. Portability is not indexed for inflation after the year of death. The estate tax return must be filed [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key features of 2013 estate tax laws after American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) include the following.  Information from partner Karen Hindson of the Georgia and South Carolina estate planning firm Hindson &amp; Melton LLC:</p>
<ul>
<li>The exclusion amount of $5 million continues in effect but is inflation-adjusted; for 2012 the exclusion amount was $5.12 million and for 2013 it increases to $5.25 million.  If ATRA had not passed, the estate tax exclusion amount for 2013 would have dropped to $1 million, with no inflation adjustment.</li>
<li>Portability has been enacted as a permanent feature of federal estate tax law.  Portability allows a surviving spouse to utilize the unused portion of the first spouse to die&#8217;s gift and estate tax exclusion amount.</li>
<li>Portability is an election that requires filing a Form 706 estate tax return, even if the estate and gifts of the first spouse are less than the exclusion amount.   As a result, the surviving spouse must weigh the expense and complexity of filing the estate tax return against the likelihood that the second spouse to die will need the unused portion of the first spouse&#8217;s gift and estate tax exclusion amount.</li>
<li>Portability is not indexed for inflation after the year of death.</li>
<li>The estate tax return must be filed within 9 months after date of death so the portability election is time-sensitive.  It is possible to request a 6 month extension.</li>
<li>For 2013 and future years, the top tax rate for federal estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer tax increases to 40 percent.   Absent ATRA, the estate tax rate for 2013 would have jumped to 55 percent with no portability feature.</li>
<li>Some couples think that portability will fully address their estate tax planning concerns.  However, portability does not offer any creditor protection, and the surviving spouse might select beneficiaries that the first spouse did not intend after the death of the first spouse.  Traditional estate planning tools such as credit shelter trusts continue to offer safeguards that are desirable to some clients.</li>
<li>State estate tax and inheritance tax laws vary widely and must be considered in estate planning.  As states seek additional revenues, expect creativity on this front.  A limited number  of states currently give domestic partners tax parity with surviving spouses.</li>
<li>The annual gift tax exclusion amount has been $13,000; for 2013 it increases to $14,000 per donee ($28,000 if gift-splitting).</li>
</ul>
<p>While the rules and the tools change from year to year, the fundamental importance of estate planning has not changed.  Work with a qualified estate planning attorney to clarify your estate planning objectives and implement a plan appropriate to your family and assets.  Hindson &amp; Melton LLC serves clients in Georgia and South Carolina, including Atlanta, Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Roswell, Charleston, and surrounding communities.</p>
<p>© <em>Karen S. Hindson, Hindson &amp; Melton LLC, March 23, 2013</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hindsonmelton.net/2013-estate-tax-law-update-from-hindson-and-melton-llc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child Support Modification and Contempt of Court</title>
		<link>http://hindsonmelton.net/child-support-modification-and-contempt-of-court/</link>
		<comments>http://hindsonmelton.net/child-support-modification-and-contempt-of-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 03:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hindsonmelton]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Child Custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alpharetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dunwoody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roswell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hindsonmelton.net/?p=2420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A child support modification (or child custody modification, or visitation modification) and a contempt of court action can now be filed together in the same petition, even if the Defendant resides in a county other than the county of the original divorce decree.  The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 4, 2013, in the case known as Ford v. Hanna, announced this rule.  Formerly, Georgia law was that the child custody, child support, or visitation modification had to be brought in the county of the Defendant&#8217;s current residence, and the contempt of court action had to be brought in the county of the original divorce decree.  This frequently resulted in the anomaly (and expense) of two cases pending in different counties at the same time. A child support or child custody modification action has traditionally been filed in the county of the current residence of the Defendant.  Contempt of court actions have been filed in the county that granted the original divorce, the theory being that the Court that entered the original order was the only court that had jurisdiction to decide whether to hold a party in contempt for failure to comply. For some years, there has been an exception to the normal rule, permitting a Defendant to file [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A child support modification (or child custody modification, or visitation modification) and a contempt of court action can now be filed together in the same petition, even if the Defendant resides in a county other than the county of the original divorce decree.  The Supreme Court of Georgia on March 4, 2013, in the case known as <em>Ford v. Hanna, </em>announced this rule.  Formerly, Georgia law was that the child custody, child support, or visitation modification had to be brought in the county of the Defendant&#8217;s current residence, and the contempt of court action had to be brought in the county of the original divorce decree.  This frequently resulted in the anomaly (and expense) of two cases pending in different counties at the same time.</p>
<p>A child support or child custody modification action has traditionally been filed in the county of the current residence of the Defendant.  Contempt of court actions have been filed in the county that granted the original divorce, the theory being that the Court that entered the original order was the only court that had jurisdiction to decide whether to hold a party in contempt for failure to comply.</p>
<p>For some years, there has been an exception to the normal rule, permitting a Defendant to file a &#8220;counterclaim&#8221; for contempt along with the answer to a modification action.  The <em>Ford v. Hanna</em> case announces the Supreme Court&#8217;s conclusion that the Petitioner can now combine a modification action and a contempt action together in the same Petition.  The proper county for filing the action is the county of the Defendant&#8217;s residence, in order that the Court will have personal jurisdiction over the Defendant.</p>
<p>Thus, for example, if a parent needs to petition the Court to modify custody and change the visitation schedule, and the Defendant also has failed to abide by the Court&#8217;s original order to pay child support or medical expenses, both the modification and contempt actions can be combined in a single action filed by Petitioner in the Defendant&#8217;s county of residence.</p>
<p>Hindson &amp; Melton LLC can assist you in evaluating your Georgia child custody, child support, and modification questions.  We will help you formulate a course of action appropriate to your situation.  Our offices are convenient to metro north Atlanta and Dunwoody, Sandy Springs, Roswell, Alpharetta, and Marietta, and we accept cases throughout the extended metro Atlanta area.</p>
<p><em>© Karen S. Hindson, Hindson &amp; Melton LLC, March 11, 2013</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hindsonmelton.net/child-support-modification-and-contempt-of-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
